Are severity and location of facial trauma risk factors for cervical spine injuries? 10-year analysis based on the use of the AO spine injury classification and the comprehensive facial injury (CFI) score.

PURPOSE: This study aims to demonstrate a correlation between cervical spine injury and location and severity of facial trauma. METHODS: We did a 10-year retrospective analysis of prospectively collected patients with at least one facial and/or cervical spine injury. We classified facial injuries using the Comprehensive Facial Injury (CFI) score, and stratified patients into mild (CFI < 4), moderate (4 ≤ CFI < 10) and severe facial trauma (CFI ≥ 10). The primary outcome was to recognize the severity and topography of the facial trauma which predict the probability of associated cervical spine injuries. RESULTS: We included 1197 patients: 78% with facial injuries, 16% with spine injuries and 6% with both. According to the CFI score, 48% of patients sustained a mild facial trauma, 35% a moderate one and 17% a severe one. The midface was involved in 45% of cases, then the upper facial third (13%) and the lower one (10%). The multivariate analysis showed multiple independent risk factors for associated facial and cervical spine injuries, among them an injury of the middle facial third (OR 1.11 p 0.004) and the facial trauma severity, having every increasing point of CFI score a 6% increasing risk (OR 1.06 p 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Facial trauma is a risk factor for a concomitant cervical spine injury. Among multiple risk factors, severe midfacial trauma is an important red flag. The stratification of facial injuries based on the CFI score through CT-scan images could be a turning point in the management of patients at risk for cervical spine injuries before imaging is available.

Facing Trauma and Surgical Emergency in Space: Hemorrhagic Shock.

Although the risk of trauma in space is low, unpredictable events can occur that may require surgical treatment. Hemorrhage can be a life-threatening condition while traveling to another planet and after landing on it. These exploration missions call for a different approach than rapid return to Earth, which is the policy currently adopted on the International Space Station (ISS) in low Earth orbit (LEO). Consequences are difficult to predict, given the still scarce knowledge of human physiology in such environments. Blood loss in space can deplete the affected astronaut's physiological reserves and all stored crew supplies. In this review, we will describe different aspects of hemorrhage in space, and by comparison with terrestrial conditions, the possible solutions to be adopted, and the current state of the art.

A prospective study comparing two methods of pre-hospital triage for trauma.

We conducted a prospective study comparing two different pre-hospital triage tools for trauma: the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) field triage decision scheme and the TRENAU score. The main objective was to evaluate which triage tool was more appropriate in the setting of Lombardy's trauma system. Data were collected from the population of trauma patients admitted to Niguarda hospital in Milan from January to June 2021. RStudio and Excel were used for data analysis. For each triage tool performance measures, Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, and overtriage and undertriage rates were obtained. A total of 1439 injured patients admitted through 118 pre-hospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were included in the study. The ACS-COT triage tool showed a good accuracy but an excessive overtriage rate (59%). The TRENAU triage tool had a moderately good accuracy and a low overtriage rate (23%) while maintaining an acceptable undertriage rate (3.9%). The TRENAU triage tool proved to be efficient in optimizing the use of resources dedicated to trauma care while resulting safe for the injured patient. In a modern trauma system such as Lombardy's it would be more appropriate to adopt the TRENAU score over the ACS-COT field triage decision scheme.

Infectious complications of extra-peritoneal pelvic packing in emergency room.

PURPOSE: The Extra-Peritoneal Pelvic Packing (EPP) is a procedure used in emergency conditions to control pelvic hemorrhage. This procedure can be performed in Emergency Room (ER) if the patient is too unstable to be transported into the operating room (OR), with a possible increased risk of infections linked to a less sterile environment. METHODS: All patients who underwent EPP from 2009 to 2018 were selected from the trauma registry. The patients were divided into two groups according to where EPP was performed (ER or OR). A Propensity Score Matching was realized. EPP was removed in all patients in the OR after obtaining hemodynamic stabilization within 24-48 h and surgical pads were sent to the laboratory for microbiological analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients underwent EPP during the period of the study. After PSM, 26 couples of patients were selected. No differences were observed between the two groups in the development of pelvic infection. Patients managed in OR showed a higher rate of associated abdominal injuries (p = 0.027) and an increasing need for external fixation (p = 0,005) as well as an increased proportion of laparotomies (p = 0.023), orthopedic interventions (p = 0.005) and a higher systolic blood pressure on admission (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The EPP is a safe procedure, even when performed out of OR. The EPP in ER allows an earlier control of bleeding in patients in extremis. To minimize the risk of infection, EPP should be removed early, as soon as hemodynamics have been stabilized.

Surgical management of abdominal compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The majority of intensive care physicians recognize the clinical significance of intra-abdominal hypertension on the outcome of critically ill patients. Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined as an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) >20 mmHg with ongoing organ failure. However, there is no consensus regarding the indications for surgical decompression. METHODS: A review of personal data and the English literature from 1989 to 2010 focusing on surgical management of ACS. RESULTS: Opening the abdomen is the most effective method to reduce IAP and is the treatment of choice for ACS when IAP is constantly higher than 30 mmHg with ongoing organ failure refractory to medical therapy. A vertical midline incision is the most popular method of surgical decompression, but bilateral subcostal incisions may be indicated in certain conditions. Surgical decompression always obtains a significant decrease in the IAP with physiological improvement, but the effects on organ function are controversial. Negative pressure devices are the most effective for temporary abdominal closure with a higher rate of primary fascial closure and lower risk of fistulas. When primary fascial closure is not feasible, a planned ventral hernia and spontaneous granulation with or without biologic mesh are the preferred methods for the reconstruction of abdominal wall integrity. CONCLUSION: Modern surgical techniques for opening the abdomen in patients with ACS refractory to medical therapy result in physiologic improvement with less treatment-related complications, but recuperation of organ dysfunction is variable.

Niguarda Trauma Team: outcome of three years of activity.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to prove the existence of a direct relationship between the comprehensive strategy of trauma management and an enhancement in outcome. Tests were carried out on the impact of the Niguarda Trauma Team System on mortality rates due to severe trauma. METHODS: The epidemiological data was retrospectively reviewed along with, the severity scores: Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Probability of survival (Ps) and the outcome of severe trauma admitted to Niguarda hospital between October 2002 and September 2005. All data were collected from the Trauma Registry of the Niguarda Hospital. Two subsequent periods of 20 and 16 months were compared. RESULTS: Nine hundred forty-two severe traumas (94.05% blunt trauma) were recorded with an overtriage rate of 36.09%. Most patients were admitted for bone and muscular injuries (52.22%). Excluding the patients who were overtriaged, there were 129 patients who died. Comparing the two periods, the Authors observed a significant reduction in mortality from 22.56% to 19.75%, mainly related to a decrease in early mortality due to hemodynamic instability. Central nervous system injury was the main cause of death (65%). Average hospital stay significantly decreased from 17.01+/-12.07 days to 14.97+/-10.34 days. CONCLUSION: Introducing a comprehensive strategy of severe trauma management, the Niguarda Trauma Team System had a significant impact on mortality rates and hospital stay.

Laparoscopic splenectomy: A retrospective review of 75 cases.

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is considered a safe procedure for spleens of normal size as well as for larger spleens. Seventy-five consecutive patients underwent LS. Splenomegaly was defined by diameter >15 cm and by weight >400 g. Thirty patients had splenomegaly. The outcomes with spleens <15 cm and spleens >15 cm were compared. LS was successfully completed in 73 cases (97.4%). Spleens >15 cm required longer operating time and were associated with greater blood loss (P < 0.001), longer hospital stay, and more complications. Two patients needed blood transfusion. No overwhelming postsplenectomy infection was registered, and operative mortality was zero.

Treatment of critical bleeding in trauma patients.

AIM: Massive haemorrhage after trauma is a big challenge for care-givers, being a leading cause of early in-hospital mortality. Surgical bleeding may be easily controlled with several techniques. Otherwise, consumptive coagulopathy is often extremely difficult to stop. An adjunctive strategy to treat traumatic coagulopathic bleeding is recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) (NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). METHODS: All major trauma victims haemodinamically unstable (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or > 90 mmHg with massive infusions or vasopressors) admitted to the Emergency Department of the Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital in Milan from October 2002 to September 2005 were reviewed. Mechanical bleeding was controlled with interventional techniques when indicated. Blood derivatives were administrated to maintain haemoglobin> 7 g/dL, INR < 1.5, fibrinogen > 1 and platelet count > 50 x 109. Off-label administration of rFVIIa was performed in the last year in any coagulopathic salvageable patient when all other strategies failed to control bleeding. RESULTS: Major trauma were 942, mean age 32.49+/-18.44 years, 94% blunt trauma, 25.13% haemodynamically unstable. Deaths occurred in 17.02% of cases before any procedure. Emergency invasive treatments were performed in 72.34% of cases. Infusions restored haemodynamic stability in 10.63% of patients. In average 9.4+/-4.1 units of red blood cells were transfused in unstable patients. rFVIIa (dosing 60-100 mg/kg) was administrated in 12 patients. Mortality occurred in 33.33% of cases. The principal cause of death was brain injury. A femoral artery thrombosis was observed in a mangled leg. No other adverse effects due to rFVIIa were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label administration of rFVIIa was able to reverse life-threatening bleeding not manageable with standard strategies in our series of major trauma patients without systemic adverse effects.

[Trauma registry at the Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital of Milano: epidemiology and quality assessment]. / Il Registro Traumi dell'Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda di Milano: dati epidemiologici e verifica di qualità.

OBJECTIVE: In a Trauma System, Trauma Registry allows the assessment of epidemiology and quality of patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data about trauma patients admitted to Ospedale Niguarda Emergency Department from October 1, 2002 to June 30, 2003 with ICD9CM code 800-939.9 and 950-959.9 were prospectively recorded. Injury severity score (ISS) and revised trauma score (RTS) were calculated and probability of survival (Ps) was derived. RESULTS: During the study period 1811 trauma patients were admitted, and 271 (14.96%) were consistent with triage criteria of severity. Among these, survivors were 220 (81.18%) and blunt trauma 95.94%. Injuries of the central nervous system with (11.76%) or without (50.98%) hemodynamic instability or hemodynamic instability alone (31.37%), were the principal causes of death. An ISS greater than 15 was observed in 61.25% with an overtriage of 38.75%. Seventy seven patients accepted without triage criteria of severity died or were admitted to intensive care unit with an undertriage of 5%. Ps among victims was 22.35 +/- 27.19 and possible preventable deaths were 6 (11.76%). No frankly preventable death was recorded. DISCUSSION: Standard pre-hospital triage criteria are associated with significant over and undertriage. Data collection using large population-based data base increases epidemiologic value of trauma registry. Analysis of Ps identifies cases who need clinical discussion to assess adequacy of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective data collection in a trauma registry may provide all informations useful to improve quality of trauma patient care.

Analysis of deaths due to injury in Milano: preliminary results.

We reviewed all trauma deaths occurring in the urban area of Milan during one year. Autopsy reports were cross-referenced with pre- and in-hospital records and the Injury Severity Score was calculated by a senior surgeon. Causes of deaths were defined as central nervous system injury (CNS), hemorrhage (HEM), combined central nervous system injury and hemorrhage (CNS + HEM), and burns (BURN). Places of death were considered the scene (DOS), during transportation (DOA), the emergency room (DER), and hospital. Two multidisciplinary commissions reviewed patient reports and deaths were judged non-preventable, possibly preventable or frankly preventable, using the unanimous decision rule. The TRISS method was used to calculate the probability of survival for in-hospital deaths. Overall trauma deaths were 255 with 78.04% blunt and 16.08% penetrating traumas. Burns accounted for 5.88%. CNS and CNS + HEM caused 171 (67.05%) deaths. DOS were 91, DOA 48, DER 34, and in-hospital deaths 33. Victims found dead (49 individuals) were excluded from further analysis. The commissions classified 56.31% of deaths as non-preventable, 32.03% as possibly preventable and 11.65% as frankly preventable. The Injury Severity Score decreased from DOS to in-hospital deaths (p < 0.05). The preventability rate was higher for in-hospital deaths (p < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that the development of a tiered trauma system in Milan is mandatory.